Image by umjanedoan via Flickr

Contrary to Polk’s contention, the “continuing violation” doctrine is inapplicable to these time-barred acts. Under that doctrine, if a defendant has engaged in a series of unlawful acts over an extended period, a plaintiff may be allowed to obtain relief for a time-barred act by linking it with an act that occurs within the limitations period. However, the continuing violation doctrine has been limited to discrimination cases. See Harmon v. Fred S. James & Co., 899 P.2d 258 (Colo. App. 1994).  Polk v. Land, 5 P.3d 402 (Colo.App. 2000).

• When May a Corporation be Judicially Dissolved?
• When Does the Statute of Limitations Begin to Run?
• Are Collection Due Process Hearings All Void?? Probably!
• What Does it Mean When a Judge Fails to File His Oath?
• Is a Judge a Fiduciary? The Facts 2:
• Know of Any IRS Agents Involved in Willful Oppression?
• When Must a Trial Judge Disqualify Himself?
• Does the Creator Care What We Call Him?
• Cracks in the Constitution; What Can Be Done About Them?
• Hallowed be Thy Name?