Is a Judge a Fiduciary? The Conclusion:
Posted on: May 21, 2009 by: admin
- Image by PappaJack via Flickr
When I realized the judge had just used his official position to benefit himself I put together a motion for substitution of judge based on breach of fiduciary duty principles. Here is the conclusion I arrived at in that motion:
31. For Judge Daniel Naughty to deny my Motion for Court to Take Mandatory Judicial Notice of Judicial Misconduct containing the criminal accusations enumerated in ΒΆΒΆ 11-23 supra against Judge Naughty personally in a one paragraph ruling not containing any details justifying the decision constitutes a breach of fiduciary duty and betrays a bias of the most egregious kind against myself. For this reason, Judge Naughty must recuse himself from hearing this case by granting this motion.
32. Furthermore, to deny my Motion for Court to Take Mandatory Judicial Notice of Judicial Misconduct in which I extended “mercy and forgiveness to both Judge Daniel Naughty and ‘the very bad attorney that represents the defendant” is further proof that Judge Naughty has not been reading my paperwork in this case.
Wherefore, the judge of this Court, Judge Daniel Naughty, should recuse himself from hearing this case.

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=c8f7a5a0-ae8b-4c86-bdaf-7511d6fe9f2b)