Although generally overlooked it cannot reasonably be denied that prior to the adoption of the Thirteenth Amendment in 1866, the exercise of freedom by certain people in the United States, was viewed as a criminal act.

Although this view certainly seems strange, a careful examination thereof will convince any reasonable person that prior to 1868, it was indeed criminal for those persons bound into slavery to seek or claim freedom for themselves. Any black (or white), slave who was to escape and flee to a state where slavery was not practiced would be hunted down and, when caught, severely punished for such transgression, and then returned to the former condition of slavery; therefore, the claim or exercise of freedom by such persons, was indeed a criminal act, therefore, it reasonably follows that the Thirteenth Amendment did undeniably constitute the decriminalization of freedom.

It is important to understand that although the Thirteenth Amendment clearly prohibits slavery and involuntary servitude, the Thirteenth Amendment does not in any way regulate voluntary servitude.

That is why the Fourteenth Amendment was promulgated, as the “work around”, wherein the political status “citizen of the United States”, first mentioned in Article One of the Constitution, is presented and defined in such a way as to constitute the recognition of a person’s freeborn right to voluntarily enter himself into a condition of voluntary servitude.

The content of the Fourteenth Amendment wherein it is set forth and established that citizens of the United States are subject to the jurisdiction thereof, that this mandatory provision makes it abundantly clear that the Thirteenth Amendment establishes that a person cannot possibly be born automatically, into the political status of citizen of the United States!

All humans everywhere on this planet are born with ten fingers, ten toes, two eyes, two legs, etc. These are all conditions determined and assigned by Nature not by political governments. “Citizenship” is certainly not assigned by Nature. As “citizenship” is not a Natural condition assigned by Nature how then can “citizenship” possibly be acquired merely due to the location of a person’s birth?
Mandatory citizenship assigned as a condition of birth is a political status determined by political tyrants for the purpose of extracting tribute and obedience from those unwittingly duped into volunteering into citizenship through mind control imposed in government indoctrination centers euphemistically known as public schools!

The Thirteenth Amendment constitutes the decriminalization of freedom! Being free to apply for permission does not in any way constitute freedom!

As Freedom is no longer a crime, isn’t it time that we begin to practice it by refusing to be duped into “voluntarily” claiming citizenship?

Cheers,

I’m Eric, WhoRU??
ewrbn[at]yahoo.com

• Does the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Apply to the IRS?
• Human Beings Sold, Bred, & Distributed Like Beasts!?
• Are You Revealing the Father’s Name or Concealing It?
• In Law, is Everything Divisible by Two?
• What Does it Mean When a Judge Fails to File His Oath?
• A Discussion of Negligence and Intentional Torts
• employment criminal background checks
• YOUR LAWYER MUST BE JURISDICTION SPECIFIC
• Did the IRS Levy Your Bank or Employer?
• IRS Plays Mean Trick on Levies