Image via Wikipedia

I encountered an appellate attorney and began a dialogue with her respecting the Federal Income Tax and the IRS. Her comments are in black and mine are in this color.

I am an appellate attorney who practices before the U.S. Supreme Court and other federal and state appellate courts.

All that tells me is that you know on a first hand basis how corrupt those courts are. With respect to the Income Tax, most judges are in violation of 18 USC § 2383 & 2384. Your influence and knowledge would certainly be instrumental in getting them prosecuted.

I know quite a bit about statutory and constitutional interpretation.

In addition to working fulltime for a law firm, I speak 3-4 times a week on the Constitution, teaching patriots how to regain control of their government.  I do not charge a speaker’s fee.  I do it on my own dime and time – unlike most, if not all, of the charlatans who are perpetuating tax myths.

I applaud you for that. So far, you haven’t taught us a thing in these emails.

I don’t see how your comment, “Sorry, people, but there is a federal income tax.  The Constitution authorizes it.” fits into the above paragraph.

Have you ever looked into how many 26 USC § 7214 prosecutions there have been? Did you ever wonder why there are so few? Violations of § 7214 are rampant. Forensic accountant Victoria Osborne finds these violations all the time. How about if you use some of your credibility and knowledge as an attorney to convince the DOJ to prosecute some IRS personnel? If they refuse, how about if you help us write some really credible complaints to file against them in the district court. How about if you help us get in front of some federal grand juries so we can get some indictments on IRS personnel? If the DOJ continues to be all palsy walsy with the IRS, how about helping us go after the DOJ on their violations of 18 USC §§ 2 & 3?

You, of all people, should know about the hearings that preceded the Restructuring & Reform Act of 1998 and why the Treasury Inspector General’s office was set up. Another thought; the fact that the OFFICIALS in the Treasury Inspector General’s office must PERSONALLY file returns and be subject to the arbitrary and capricious nature of the IRS has rendered them toothless as well. If you review their audit reports you will see that they are all palsy walsy with the IRS. They see the crimes the IRS commits and do nothing about it respecting prosecution.

Evans v. Gore was overturned (a case holding that judges were not subject to the Income Tax)

Here’s another thought; if the only one who can understand the Internal Revenue Code is “an appellate attorney who practices before the U.S. Supreme Court and other federal and state appellate courts.” who knows “quite a bit about statutory and constitutional interpretation.” what is that telling us about the Code? Do you recognize this phrase: “…ordinary people can understand what conduct is prohibited and in a manner that does not encourage arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement.“? If we must wait until we are in front of a judge to find out whether our conduct is conformed to the law, what is that telling us about the Code? If on a whim, an IRS agent can disallow our deductions 4-7 years after the fact resulting in a bunch of penalties and interest, what is that telling us about the Code? If the Supreme Court ruled in Evans that they couldn’t tax a judge, why then is Judge Joseph W. Woodrough, in the face of the Evans decision, just 19 years later, having to pay a tax under protest and having to sue to get his refund?  I thought the IRS was supposed to honor Supreme Court decisions? What that gives us is two judges who paid the tax and sued for a refund; one who won in Evans, and one who lost in Woodrough. What does the fact that there is a 50/50 chance of prevailing which depends upon who is sitting in the Court at the time your petition for cert arrives tell us about the Code, IRS, and the judiciary? What’s up with Congress passing another law to tax judges knowing full well about the Supreme Court’s ruling in Evans?

Another thought; I wonder why this attorney respects the second decision and not the first? Why wouldn’t a modern day judge pay the tax and sue for a refund and take the issue up again?

If I am in court on an IRS issue, how do you think the judge will respond when I tell him that I want to know as much about him as my opponent knows? If I say, hey judge, I need to look into personal papers the same way the IRS has, so I can determine if you can sit on this case. What do you think the judge will say? Why hasn’t he already told the IRS, you want to look at my “papers”, get a warrant! The IRS and the DOJ work this the same way the cops do; they gather evidence that would be subject to suppression and never use it in court. They use that evidence to gather other evidence that is not subject to suppression. Or, they never reveal to the court or defense that they gathered the evidence illegally. I watched a cop walk into a house when no one was home without a warrant! Oh yeah, it happens. Ah, who cares, most of the time the DOJ will prevail anyway because the judge is a former prosecutor. How about this: Judge, we need to see your tax return. We need to have a CPA examine it to see if there is anything questionable in it that the IRS can use against you to keep you in fear of being discovered.

Rebecca, this is right in front of your face, but you haven’t recognized it; judges are fraidy cats! That’s why they have guards outside their courts. That’s why they don’t want us to know where they live. That’s why they take different routes to work and park in underground parking garages. The IRS and the DOJ made an example out of a judge in Las Vegas by putting him in prison. It is just inescapable human nature to use a judgeship to protect oneself personally from the IRS.

Related articles by Zemanta

• IRS agent indicted in refi scheme (dontmesswithtaxes.typepad.com)

• Did Samuel Adams Predict the Political Climate Today?
• Did You Know that Attorneys from FL & LA Argued Successfully that there is No Law Requiring the Filing of a Federal Income Tax Return?
• Is This ALL We Need to Know About Government Red Tape?
• Ha! Attorney Collects on Insurance for Cigars that Burned Up??
• Should you hire a tax debt attorney?
• Deep Spiritual Conference Call Friday Night 7PM MST
• Advanced Consumer Tactics 101 – How to Write effective Complaints Letters
• Can the IRS Just Do Whatever It Wants??
• Do You Agree with Perry Marshall on This?
• Why Does Bear Make His Prayers 1st Person?