Comments for Legalbears Blog Forum http://legalbearsblog.com Discuss and Learn spiritual tactics to use against the IRS, Court or Any Agency Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:17:48 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 Comment on Why Not Arm Yourself to the Teeth for Your Collection Due Process Hearing? by uberVU - social comments http://legalbearsblog.com/2010/01/why-not-arm-yourself-to-the-teeth-for-your-collection-due-process-hearing/comment-page-1/#comment-1266 uberVU - social comments Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:17:48 +0000 http://legalbearsblog.com/?p=1938#comment-1266 <strong>Social comments and analytics for this post...</strong> This post was mentioned on Twitter by trafficrocket: Why Not Arm Yourself to the Teeth for Your Collection Due Process Hearing? http://bit.ly/916L5p... Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by trafficrocket: Why Not Arm Yourself to the Teeth for Your Collection Due Process Hearing? http://bit.ly/916L5p…

]]> Comment on What’s Wrong With Calling the Creator God?? by Legalbears Blog Forum » What’s Wrong With Calling the Creator God?? Part 2 http://legalbearsblog.com/2010/03/whats-wrong-with-calling-the-creator-god/comment-page-1/#comment-1253 Legalbears Blog Forum » What’s Wrong With Calling the Creator God?? Part 2 Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:48:44 +0000 http://legalbearsblog.com/?p=1979#comment-1253 [...] Part 1 of this post is here. [...] [...] Part 1 of this post is here. [...]

]]> Comment on What’s Wrong With Calling the Creator God?? Part 2 by Legalbears Blog Forum » What’s Wrong With Calling the Creator God?? http://legalbearsblog.com/2010/03/whats-wrong-with-calling-the-creator-god-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1252 Legalbears Blog Forum » What’s Wrong With Calling the Creator God?? Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:46:47 +0000 http://legalbearsblog.com/?p=2016#comment-1252 [...] Supposedly, JeZeus was arrived at because the Greeks had difficulties transliterating Jahushuwah’s name. By blotting out Jahushuwah’s name the Greeks acted contrary to Deuteronomy 12:3-4 (We are to destroy, or lay waste to the pagan deity’s names, but, we are not to do so to Jahuwah’s name) and Revelation 2:13, where Jahushuwah says, “you are clinging to and holding fast My name” where “clinging to and holding fast My name” means to keep it carefully and faithfully; to retain (meaning to keep it in its original form). I reminded him that we are not Greek and in English we have all the sounds necessary to pronounce both the Father’s and the Son’s Hebrew Names. Jahushuwah’s Name is laced through all the Old Covenant and translated in English as salvation; Yah-hoo-shoo-ah. There is most certainly no reason why we should perpetuate the Greek’s error. Here is Part 2 of this post. [...] [...] Supposedly, JeZeus was arrived at because the Greeks had difficulties transliterating Jahushuwah’s name. By blotting out Jahushuwah’s name the Greeks acted contrary to Deuteronomy 12:3-4 (We are to destroy, or lay waste to the pagan deity’s names, but, we are not to do so to Jahuwah’s name) and Revelation 2:13, where Jahushuwah says, “you are clinging to and holding fast My name” where “clinging to and holding fast My name” means to keep it carefully and faithfully; to retain (meaning to keep it in its original form). I reminded him that we are not Greek and in English we have all the sounds necessary to pronounce both the Father’s and the Son’s Hebrew Names. Jahushuwah’s Name is laced through all the Old Covenant and translated in English as salvation; Yah-hoo-shoo-ah. There is most certainly no reason why we should perpetuate the Greek’s error. Here is Part 2 of this post. [...]

]]> Comment on Why Not Arm Yourself to the Teeth for Your Collection Due Process Hearing? by Rosalinda Minner http://legalbearsblog.com/2010/01/why-not-arm-yourself-to-the-teeth-for-your-collection-due-process-hearing/comment-page-1/#comment-1250 Rosalinda Minner Sun, 07 Mar 2010 09:13:08 +0000 http://legalbearsblog.com/?p=1938#comment-1250 Thank you very much I found just the info I already searched everywhere and just couldn't find. What a great website. Thank you very much I found just the info I already searched everywhere and just couldn’t find. What a great website.

]]> Comment on Why Not Arm Yourself to the Teeth for Your Collection Due Process Hearing? by admin http://legalbearsblog.com/2010/01/why-not-arm-yourself-to-the-teeth-for-your-collection-due-process-hearing/comment-page-1/#comment-1244 admin Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:13:15 +0000 http://legalbearsblog.com/?p=1938#comment-1244 Once they have the number, it is virtually impossible to get them to turn loose of it. If I were you, I would send my husband out to look for another job and teach the new employer how to let him work without a number by doing a search in Google for these terms: famguardian.org "no Social Security" and studying the issue out. I would suggest learning to live life without the number. No, make that, I would suggest making a heart felt commitment to live without the number. Once they have the number, it is virtually impossible to get them to turn loose of it. If I were you, I would send my husband out to look for another job and teach the new employer how to let him work without a number by doing a search in Google for these terms: famguardian.org “no Social Security” and studying the issue out. I would suggest learning to live life without the number. No, make that, I would suggest making a heart felt commitment to live without the number.

]]> Comment on Why Not Arm Yourself to the Teeth for Your Collection Due Process Hearing? by admin http://legalbearsblog.com/2010/01/why-not-arm-yourself-to-the-teeth-for-your-collection-due-process-hearing/comment-page-1/#comment-1243 admin Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:03:15 +0000 http://legalbearsblog.com/?p=1938#comment-1243 Alisa, this one sounds to far out there for me. Do you have any research to back up your assertions? Bear Alisa, this one sounds to far out there for me. Do you have any research to back up your assertions? Bear

]]> Comment on Trademark – Trademark Clearance Not an Option For Internet Businesses Looking to Avoid Trademark Infringement by fricheshespiz http://legalbearsblog.com/2010/02/trademark-trademark-clearance-not-an-option-for-internet-businesses-looking-to-avoid-trademark-infringement/comment-page-1/#comment-1241 fricheshespiz Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:58:56 +0000 http://legalbearsblog.com/2010/02/trademark-trademark-clearance-not-an-option-for-internet-businesses-looking-to-avoid-trademark-infringement/#comment-1241 The response to local and national disasters is noble but it's a damn shame that so many people take advantage of the sad situations. I mean everytime there is an earthquake, a flood, an oil spill - there's always a group of heartless people who rip off tax payers. This is in response to reading that 4 of Oprah Winfreys "angels" got busted ripping off the system. Shame on them! http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/08/19/crimesider/entry5251471.shtml The response to local and national disasters is noble but it’s a damn shame that so many people take advantage of the sad situations.

I mean everytime there is an earthquake, a flood, an oil spill – there’s always a group of heartless people who rip off tax payers.

This is in response to reading that 4 of Oprah Winfreys “angels” got busted ripping off the system. Shame on them!
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/08/19/crimesider/entry5251471.shtml

]]> Comment on Money Laundering in A Changed World by medical insurance http://legalbearsblog.com/2010/02/money-laundering-in-a-changed-world/comment-page-1/#comment-1239 medical insurance Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:34:45 +0000 http://legalbearsblog.com/2010/02/money-laundering-in-a-changed-world/#comment-1239 Real wealth is what you own: cars, homes, shovels, hammers, soap, cigarettes, etc. How much of a chunk of metal you have in your safe or how many numbers your computer says you have in a bank is not real wealth. What you BUY with that gold or money is what real wealth is. Real wealth is what you own: cars, homes, shovels, hammers, soap, cigarettes, etc. How much of a chunk of metal you have in your safe or how many numbers your computer says you have in a bank is not real wealth. What you BUY with that gold or money is what real wealth is.

]]> Comment on Why Not Arm Yourself to the Teeth for Your Collection Due Process Hearing? by Celeste http://legalbearsblog.com/2010/01/why-not-arm-yourself-to-the-teeth-for-your-collection-due-process-hearing/comment-page-1/#comment-1238 Celeste Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:09:14 +0000 http://legalbearsblog.com/?p=1938#comment-1238 Even though my husband works as contract labor (his is a repeat business) no ss#, no hire. How do you get around this? Even though my husband works as contract labor (his is a repeat business) no ss#, no hire. How do you get around this?

]]> Comment on Why Not Arm Yourself to the Teeth for Your Collection Due Process Hearing? by Alisa http://legalbearsblog.com/2010/01/why-not-arm-yourself-to-the-teeth-for-your-collection-due-process-hearing/comment-page-1/#comment-1234 Alisa Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:09:28 +0000 http://legalbearsblog.com/?p=1938#comment-1234 Thinking more about why SSA prints your NAME on the card, I've decided they do this because your NAME is your property and when someone returns the card to SSA (if lost or stolen) suggests that not only the card/number is their property but your NAME on the card is also. The number alone would suggest that only the card/number is their property. But since SSA does not comply with the privacy laws, not only is the card/number their property, but your NAME on the card is also their property. The card/number/NAME belongs to SSA. Your NAME no was longer your private personal property when you failed to notice the SSA was not in compliance with the privacy laws and therefore your property [NAME] would not be kept private/confidential with them. Thinking more about why SSA prints your NAME on the card, I’ve decided they do this because your NAME is your property and when someone returns the card to SSA (if lost or stolen) suggests that not only the card/number is their property but your NAME on the card is also. The number alone would suggest that only the card/number is their property. But since SSA does not comply with the privacy laws, not only is the card/number their property, but your NAME on the card is also their property. The card/number/NAME belongs to SSA. Your NAME no was longer your private personal property when you failed to notice the SSA was not in compliance with the privacy laws and therefore your property [NAME] would not be kept private/confidential with them.

]]>